I would like my boss to understand “Fundamental attribution
error (Tendency to blame someone else when
things go wrong”). As a manager he/she must have motivation
to lead other team members, but also be able to handle the pressure in order to
make the project complete. Fundamental attribution error occurs when the
manager thinks that the project process doesn’t go through well because there
is a member who has no experience and doesn’t perform well. Even though this
person is new to the company and doesn’t have much experience, the boss should
understand the situation. People tend to be stressed out when they are in a
negative situation. Managers should not blame their team members, but should give
feedback to help them to improve their performance. When managers can think
about how they would feel in that same situation happens to them, they might be
able to perform better for their members.
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Sunday, November 18, 2012
leadership
Ed Whitacre
became a CEO of General Motors in 2009. He was a former executive of AT&T.
When he became a CEO of GM, he had no experiences related to the auto industry.
However, the company wanted him to join the GM board because the company
thought his experience from a fast changing industry, which is AT&T could
bring him fresh knowledge and a new perspective to implement successful changes
in GM. Usually we think that a CEO should have more experiences and knowledge
about the industry in order to perform well.
However, it is not necessary because when a company choses new CEO from a
different type of organization, he or she is expected to make huge change of a
company with new ideas in order to perform better with new strategy. Where a CEO
of a company preforms poorly, the new CEO can change previous performance
easily without following the plans of the previous CEO. Having CEOs from different organizations
brings companies a new outlook. According to
MIT Sloan Management Review, outsider CEOs- who are less tied up with
internal political relationships face fewer obstacles in pursing the
entrepreneurial decision making needed for growth and for implementing crucial
strategic changes in a timely manner. This indicates that even though they do
not have much experience of organizations, they can propose efficient and wider
vision of strategy because they have plans and goals to make huge changes in
companies. In addition, if a company makes a new executive group, these
executives do not have negative previous experiences and strategies, thus they
are able to start with clear mind and come up with new ideas.
http://sloanreview.mit.edu/the-magazine/2012-summer/53408/when-is-an-outsider-ceo-a-good-choice/
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
HRM
When I was working in this small company, I always encountered
difficult situations at work. Since I knew the president of the company before
entering the company, he offered me a job and I accepted the offer. So I did
not have an interview. He put me in the small office with an older woman who
was my manager. There were always only two of us in the office most of the
time. People thought I was lucky because I got the job easily. The other people
had to have an interview to enter the company, the president never treated me
as any different after starting working. I was glad he treated all company members
equally, but the manager did not like the fact that I entered the company
because I knew the president for a long time. I was responsible, learned things
very quickly, and did the tasks efficiently. However, she always judged me and
complained I did not work hard. When I had family emergency or got sick, and
was not able to go to work, she was very angry and thought I lied to her. I
figured it out later but she reported her complaints to the president all the
time. I felt very uncomfortable being in the
same office with her and got very nervous to talk to her as well. Then, another
company member realized something was going on between her and I, she helped me
to work at a different office where I had to learn completely different tasks
from my previous work. In fact, I did not have many things to do at the new
office. I got bored and quit this job shortly after.
I think this could have been avoided if….
·
I had an interview, and talked with the
manager before I started working with her, she may have known my personality or
integrity more, and could have improved performance.
·
the company had solid management plans
to train employees. Since it was a new and very small company, the company did
not have many experiences and did not know how to develop the quality
workforces.
· we both could have communicated better and got along with eachother because
there were only two of us worked together for one specific task. There was a
lack of socialization between my manager and I.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)